Monday, 11 March 2019

Promoting independence

One of my friends has had an awful experience today with mental health services. She's been discharged after just six weeks and told that despite her ongoing psychotic condition, she can manage on her own, with support from her GP when needed. This seems to be the case in many areas now, with mental health services keen to discharge people under the guise of 'promoting independence' (I'd laugh but it really isn't funny). People are being discharged from services well before they are ready and if they resist, they risk being labelled 'dependent.'

Discharge as 'promoting independence' though, I mean bloody hell, talk about doublespeak! The independence and resilience agenda is potentially so very damaging, I've seen it coming for quite some time and am extremely sceptical about the current buzz word 'resilience.' The word has been so bastardised and stripped of its original meaning that it has begun to mean 'to behave as though life events have no impact.'

All too often, resilience then becomes a stick with which to beat people who are struggling. Depressed? Anxious? You just aren't sufficiently resilient! It’s also used to place blame onto people who are struggling to work under oppressive institutions and practices. The official response to burnout becomes 'this person lacks resilience,' not that they are being expected to work in impossible conditions, meeting impossible demands.

Makes me mad, this stuff. In one sense I long to be free of mental health services because they really do push some crap in our direction. On the other hand, I've (mostly) received good quality care, particularly from my care coordinators and I know that once I've been discharged (perhaps I'll be said to have 'achieved independence?') It will be incredibly difficult to access services again, should I ever need to.

You see, there's another serious problem within mental health services. In my area, to access secondary care, you must seemingly present with psychosis, but not be deemed to have 'complex needs.'  Which means that legions of people with serious (in some cases, life-threatening) mental health problems are left with the lottery of receiving care from primary care, i.e. their GP. My personal experience of GPs has been extremely variable, some have been fantastic when it comes to mental health and others dreadful. In any case, you only ever get a ten minute appointment with even the best GP and the repertoire of help and support they can offer is incredibly narrow. You might get a short course of CBT if you're lucky. Your GP could refer you to secondary services, but if that referral is turned down, you're on your own. This leaves many people without access to specialist mental health support. It's all well and good to tell people 'it's good to talk' and 'It's ok not to be ok,' but if we do reach out, who's listening and what practical support is available?

I'm told that even people within secondary mental health services are being told to 'call the Samaritans' if they are distressed. Let's get this right; people who are acknowledged to be very unwell are being told to contact a voluntary organisation, rather than ask for help from their existing mental health team. I believe this has even been said to people who are in hospital. No disrespect to the Samaritans, I think they do an amazing job; my point is that people are being turned away by their own mental health teams and asked instead to speak to a stranger on the phone.

We are told that more money than ever is being spent on mental health in a bid to achieve parity with physical health. If this is the case, then why are mental health teams becoming increasingly selective about the people they will work with? Why are we being asked to call Samaritans? And why are people still being sent hundreds of miles for a hospital bed? (I was very lucky, I was sent just 25 miles away). I don't have the answers, I just wonder.

I don't know if there's any mileage in treating mental health simply as 'health,' with the body and the mind being interconnected, two parts of the same person. I'm not sure I understand the artificial distinction between mental and physical health. Something for me to learn more about.

Meanwhile, my friend has been left to make her own way in the world. Luckily she has a supportive family who live close by and friends who are mental health savvy, for further support. Many others are less fortunate. Is 'dependence' on services really such a terrible thing?